Best AdSense Alternatives for Small Publishers in 2026

Why Publishers Are Looking Beyond AdSense

Google AdSense has been the default ad network for over two decades. It’s easy to set up, has no official traffic minimum, and connects you to the world’s largest pool of advertisers.

But the cracks are showing.

Revenue opacity. Google restructured AdSense payments to a per-impression (CPM) model in late 2023 and disclosed its revenue split for the first time: publishers keep 80% after the advertiser platform’s fee. That sounds good on paper. In practice, when Google Ads is the buyer — which is most of the time — Google retains ~15% on the buy side first, leaving publishers with roughly 68% of the original advertiser spend. After additional ad tech fees, many publishers report taking home 30-40%.

Cookie dependency. AdSense relies heavily on third-party cookies for behavioral targeting, interest-based advertising, and retargeting. Google reversed its plan to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome, so the tracking infrastructure remains. For every AdSense publisher, this means GDPR consent banners, cookie notices, and the associated legal overhead.

Performance costs. AdSense scripts add page weight and can increase Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Google’s “Auto ads” mode is convenient but gives publishers little control over placement or density.

Limited reporting. Compared to newer platforms, AdSense reporting feels dated — delayed data, limited granularity, and minimal real-time visibility.

None of this means AdSense is bad. For many publishers, it’s still a solid baseline. But it’s no longer the only option, and depending on your audience, traffic, and values, there are networks that will serve you better.

Here’s an honest look at the best alternatives in 2026.

Understanding “Revenue Share” — The Ad Tech Tax

Before comparing networks, you need to understand a critical distinction that most comparison posts ignore: what is the revenue share calculated on?

Most large ad networks (AdSense, Mediavine, Ezoic, Raptive, Monumetric) are programmatic — they operate through a supply chain of intermediaries including demand-side platforms (DSPs), supply-side platforms (SSPs), ad exchanges, data providers, and verification services. Each takes a cut before money reaches the publisher.

A smaller number of networks are direct marketplaces — advertisers buy placements directly on the platform with no intermediary supply chain. EthicalAds, Carbon Ads, and Ghost all use this model. Their stated revenue shares are close to the real effective take rate.

According to the Association of National Advertisers, only 44% of programmatic ad spend actually reaches publishers as working media. The other 56% is consumed by the supply chain.

So when a programmatic network says “90% revenue share,” they mean 90% of what’s left after the supply chain has taken its cut — not 90% of what the advertiser originally paid.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

Model	Advertiser pays	Supply chain takes	Network fee	Publisher receives
Programmatic (e.g., Ezoic at 90%)	$10.00	~$5.50 (55%)	$0.45 (10%)	~$4.05
Programmatic (e.g., Mediavine at 75%)	$10.00	~$5.50 (55%)	$1.13 (25%)	~$3.38
Direct (e.g., EthicalAds at 70%)	$10.00	$0	$3.00 (30%)	$7.00
Direct (e.g., Ghost at 75%)	$10.00	$0	$2.50 (25%)	$7.50
Direct (e.g., Carbon Ads at 60%)	$10.00	$0	$4.00 (40%)	$6.00

The effective take rate — what percentage of the advertiser’s original dollar a publisher actually receives — is what matters. A “75% share” on a direct marketplace can pay nearly double what a “90% share” on a programmatic network delivers.

This doesn’t make programmatic networks bad — they connect publishers to massive advertiser demand that direct marketplaces can’t match yet. But when comparing revenue share percentages, make sure you’re comparing the same thing.

Quick Comparison Table

Network	Model	Min. Traffic	Stated Share	Effective Take Rate	Privacy	Speed	Best For
Google AdSense	Programmatic	None (~1K practical)	~80%	~36-45%	Cookies + behavioral	Good (Google CDN)	General content, any size
EthicalAds	Direct	~50K pageviews	70%	70%	Zero cookies, contextual	Fast	Developer/technical content
Carbon Ads	Direct	Invite-only	60%	60%	Low-cookie, contextual	Fast	Dev/design, established sites
Mediavine	Programmatic	1K sessions (Journey)	70-90%	~30-40%	Cookies + programmatic	Heavy	Lifestyle, food, travel
Ezoic	Programmatic	250K users (new)	~90%	~36-40%	Cookies + first-party ID	Medium	Large content publishers
Raptive	Programmatic	25K pageviews	75%	~33-38%	Cookies + programmatic	Heavy	Food, lifestyle, US-dominant
Monumetric	Programmatic	10K pageviews	~70-80%	~30-35%	Cookies + programmatic	Medium	General blogs, 10K-500K range
Ghost	Direct	None	75%	75%	Zero cookies, contextual	Sub-50ms (edge)	Developer/tech, privacy-conscious

Effective take rate = estimated percentage of the advertiser’s original spend that reaches the publisher. Programmatic rates vary by supply path, format, and buyer. Direct marketplace rates are exact — what the network states is what publishers receive.

1. EthicalAds

EthicalAds is the most privacy-conservative ad network available. It uses zero cookies and zero third-party tracking — targeting is 100% contextual, based on the country of the visitor and ML classification of page content.

EthicalAds focuses exclusively on developer and technical audiences. If you run a programming tutorial site, open-source project docs, or a developer blog, this is the most natural fit. They require only one ad per page — no ad clutter.

Revenue share: 70% to publishers, $50 minimum payout, paid monthly. In January 2026, EthicalAds distributed $124,300 to publishers and is projecting over $500,000 across 2026.

Traffic requirements: Approximately 50,000 monthly pageviews, though they review applications manually. The bigger gate is audience fit — your site needs to serve a technical audience.

Pros:

• Truly cookieless — the strongest privacy story in the industry
• Clean, single-ad-per-page format
• No consent banners needed
• Good fit for open-source projects (they sponsor many)

Cons:

• Developer/technical niche only — not for lifestyle, food, or general content
• 50K pageview soft requirement excludes very small sites
• Lower CPMs than programmatic networks
• No self-serve option for publishers

Best for: Python/Django developers, open-source maintainers, documentation sites, technical blogs with 50K+ monthly pageviews.

2. Carbon Ads / BuySellAds

Carbon Ads is a curated, invite-only ad network operated by BuySellAds. Their roster contains approximately 900 hand-picked sites as of late 2025, all serving developer and designer audiences.

The model is simple: one ad per page, contextually targeted, minimal tracking. Carbon manually reviews every application for relevance, traffic quality, and alignment with their advertiser base.

Revenue share: 60% to publishers, 40% to Carbon/BuySellAds. CPM rates fluctuate monthly within a set range. Minimum payout: $20 (PayPal), $50 (check), $500 (wire transfer with $35 fee). Paid by the 15th of each month.

Traffic requirements: No published minimum, but being invite-only and curated means acceptance is selective. Sites need strong alignment with tech/design audiences and active maintenance.

Pros:

• Clean, single-ad format with minimal page impact
• Curated advertiser quality — no junk ads
• Fast delivery, lightweight scripts
• BuySellAds also offers a Native CPC product for additional monetization

Cons:

• 60% revenue share is the lowest on this list
• Invite-only — no guarantee of acceptance
• Limited to dev/design audiences
• Terms reserve the right to set cookies and load third-party scripts (including Google tracking pixels)

Best for: Established developer and design publications with strong audience alignment and consistent traffic.

3. Mediavine

Mediavine is the dominant premium ad network for lifestyle content. They restructured their program hierarchy significantly in January 2026, and the changes are worth understanding.

The new tiers (effective January 15, 2026):

• Journey: Now accepts sites with as few as 1,000 monthly sessions (down from 10,000). Sessions tracked via Mediavine’s Grow plugin.
• Mediavine Official: Sites with $5,000+ in annual ad revenue or 25,000+ monthly pageviews.
• Select / Signature / Premiere: Higher tiers for sites earning $100K-$500K+ per year.

Revenue share: Tiered by earnings. Journey publishers get 70%. Official gets 75%. Select gets 80%. Signature gets 85%. Premiere gets 90%. Legacy publishers retain their old structure plus a loyalty bonus of +1% per year (up to 5 years).

Pros:

• Some of the highest RPMs in the industry for lifestyle/content niches
• Journey now makes premium ads accessible to very small sites
• Strong managed service with dedicated support
• Revenue-based progression rewards growth

Cons:

• Heavy ad load — video ads, sticky sidebars, and in-content formats can impact Core Web Vitals
• Full programmatic stack with cookies and behavioral targeting
• Requires consent management infrastructure
• Strongly optimized for US-centric lifestyle content — not ideal for developer or technical audiences

Best for: Food, parenting, travel, home decor, and recipe bloggers — especially those with engaged US audiences. Journey is a genuine option for small sites in these niches.

4. Ezoic

Ezoic has long positioned itself as the accessible, AI-driven ad optimization platform. But in February 2026, everything changed.

Ezoic raised its minimum to 250,000 monthly users — up from 10,000 sessions. This is the most dramatic minimum increase in recent ad tech history. Existing publishers are grandfathered in, but new applicants must meet the new threshold or apply to the Incubator program, which accepts approximately 20 publishers per month globally.

This means Ezoic is no longer a viable option for small publishers. If you’re reading this post because you’re looking for an alternative to AdSense and you have under 250K monthly users, Ezoic is off the table.

Revenue share: Publishers can choose between an ad-funded model (Ezoic earns through advertiser-side margin) or a flat 10% fee model where publishers keep 90%. Important caveat: this 90% is calculated after the programmatic supply chain has taken its cut. The effective take rate — what publishers receive of the advertiser’s original spend — is closer to 36-40% (see Understanding Revenue Share above).

Privacy approach: Ezoic provides a Google-compliant Consent Management Platform and a proprietary first-party identity solution called ezID. They offer a “Super Privacy Mode” beta that blocks all cookies before consent. Standard programmatic demand behind the scenes still uses cookies where consent is given.

Pros:

• AI-driven layout and density optimization (new AI Ad Optimization launched November 2025)
• Strong revenue per visitor (EPMV) metrics
• JS integration method is lighter than the old DNS proxy approach
• 90% revenue share (10% fee model) is competitive

Cons:

• 250K monthly user minimum effectively excludes small publishers
• Incubator accepts only ~20 sites per month
• Optimization scripts can impact page speed
• The platform’s complexity has a learning curve

Best for: Large content publishers (250K+ monthly users) who want automated AI-driven revenue optimization. No longer relevant for small publishers.

5. Raptive (formerly AdThrive)

Raptive was historically the premium tier that most publishers aspired to reach. The good news: they’ve become significantly more accessible.

In October 2025, Raptive dropped its minimum from 100,000 to 25,000 monthly pageviews — a 75% reduction. They also eliminated the intermediate “Rise” program, folding all qualifying publishers into a single service tier. The catch: sites with 25,000-99,999 pageviews must demonstrate that at least 50% of traffic comes from Tier 1 markets (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand).

Revenue share: 75% to publishers, flat structure with no publicly disclosed tiered escalation. As of February 2026, Raptive has paid out $4 billion total to publishers.

Pros:

• Premium managed service with strong RPMs
• 25K minimum is far more accessible than the old 100K
• 75% revenue share is straightforward and competitive
• Network of 6,300+ sites provides strong advertiser demand

Cons:

• Tier 1 traffic requirement (50%+ US/UK/CA/AU/NZ) for smaller publishers
• Heavy ad load similar to Mediavine
• Full programmatic stack with cookies and behavioral targeting
• Rejected 590 sites in 2025 for AI-generated content — human content is strictly enforced

Best for: Food, lifestyle, parenting, and travel content publishers with 25K+ monthly pageviews and predominantly English-speaking, US-centric audiences.

6. Monumetric

Monumetric is a managed ad network with a four-tier program structure. It occupies the space between AdSense and the premium networks, serving publishers in the 10K-500K pageview range.

The tiers:

• Propel: 10,000-80,000 pageviews/month
• Ascend: 80,000-500,000 pageviews/month
• Stratos: 500,000-10,000,000 pageviews/month
• Apollo: 10,000,000+ pageviews/month

Propel requires a $99 one-time setup fee (waived for higher tiers). Sites must be on WordPress or Blogger, have a sidebar at least 300px wide, support minimum 6 ad slots on both desktop and mobile, and generate at least 50% of traffic from English-speaking countries.

Revenue share: Monumetric doesn’t publicly disclose exact percentages, but third-party analysis suggests publishers receive approximately 70-80% of ad revenue. They support both CPC and CPM models. Payment is on NET-60 terms — the longest payment cycle on this list.

Pros:

• 10K pageview minimum is accessible for small publishers
• Managed service handles ad setup and optimization
• Multiple monetization models (CPC and CPM)
• Lower barrier to entry than Mediavine Official or Raptive

Cons:

• $99 setup fee for Propel tier
• NET-60 payment terms (two months after the fact)
• Undisclosed revenue share percentage
• WordPress/Blogger requirement for smallest tier
• Standard programmatic cookies and behavioral targeting

Best for: Small-to-mid content blogs in the 10K-80K range that want a managed step up from AdSense but aren’t eligible for Mediavine Official or Raptive. Factor in the setup fee and NET-60 payments when comparing.

7. Ghost (New in 2026)

Ghost is a privacy-first ad marketplace built on Cloudflare Workers. Full disclosure: this is our product. We’ll be honest about both strengths and limitations.

Ghost takes a fundamentally different architectural approach: there is no database of user profiles, no cookies are set, and no fingerprinting code exists. The system is architecturally incapable of tracking users — not as a policy choice, but as a technical constraint.

Ads are served from 300+ Cloudflare edge locations worldwide with a median delivery time under 50 milliseconds. The SDK is 1.9KB gzipped. Your pages stay fast.

Revenue share: 75% to publishers, transparent and flat. Because Ghost is a direct marketplace — not a programmatic network — there are no DSPs, SSPs, or ad exchanges taking a cut before the revenue share is calculated. When an advertiser pays $10 CPM, you receive $7.50. No hidden fees, no supply chain tax. This makes Ghost’s effective take rate nearly double what most programmatic networks deliver (see Understanding Revenue Share above). The free tier lets you serve your own campaigns at no cost. Beta offer: the first 50 publishers get 100% revenue share for 3 months.

Traffic requirements: None. Ghost has no traffic minimums. A blog with 100 monthly visitors is as welcome as one with 100,000.

Integration:

<script
  src="https://api.ghostads.io/v1/sdk/ghost-sdk.js"
  data-publisher="your-publisher-id"
  data-endpoint="https://api.ghostads.io"
  defer
></script>

<div data-ghost-ad="top-banner"></div>

That’s it. The SDK handles contextual matching, consent gating, viewability tracking, and lazy loading.

Pros:

• Zero cookies, zero tracking — strongest privacy architecture alongside EthicalAds
• Sub-50ms edge delivery — fastest on this list by a wide margin
• 75% revenue share with full transparency
• No traffic minimums — open to publishers of all sizes
• Free tier for self-serve campaigns
• Approval gate: you review and approve every cross-publisher ad before it appears on your site
• Real-time analytics dashboard

Cons:

• New platform — currently in beta
• Marketplace demand is still building (advertiser supply is growing)
• Smaller advertiser pool compared to established networks
• Less proven track record than networks that have been operating for years

Best for: Developer and technical blogs, privacy-conscious publishers, sites that care about page performance, and publishers of any size who want transparent monetization without tracking their readers.

Sign up for early access — integration takes under 5 minutes.

How to Choose the Right Ad Network

There’s no single best ad network. The right choice depends on your specific situation:

If you have a developer or technical audience:

• Ghost (any traffic level, zero tracking, fastest delivery)
• EthicalAds (50K+ pageviews, zero tracking)
• Carbon Ads (invite-only, established sites)

If you run a lifestyle, food, or travel blog:

• Mediavine Journey (1K+ sessions, 70% share)
• Raptive (25K+ pageviews, 75% share, US-dominant traffic)
• Monumetric Propel (10K+ pageviews, $99 setup fee)

If privacy matters to you and your readers:

• Ghost (zero cookies, zero tracking, any traffic level)
• EthicalAds (zero cookies, 50K+ pageviews, developer audiences only)

If you want maximum revenue per visitor:

• Mediavine Official/Select (25K+ pageviews or $5K+ annual revenue)
• Raptive (25K+ pageviews)
• Ezoic (250K+ monthly users only)

If you’re just starting out (under 10K pageviews):

• Google AdSense (no minimum, broad advertiser demand)
• Ghost (no minimum, privacy-first, free tier)
• Mediavine Journey (1K+ sessions)

Conclusion

The ad network landscape shifted dramatically in 2025-2026. Ezoic priced out small publishers by raising its minimum to 250K users. Raptive became more accessible by cutting its minimum by 75%. Mediavine now accepts sites with as few as 1,000 sessions. And new privacy-first options have emerged for publishers who refuse to track their readers.

The best network for you depends on your audience, your traffic, and your values. If you’re a small publisher looking for transparent, privacy-respecting monetization without traffic gates — give Ghost a try. It’s free to start, and you’ll be serving ads in under 5 minutes.